Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop

There’s a different way of looking at the Casey Anthony case vs. the Zimmerman case. The circumstantial evidence against Anthony was strong while the evidence against Zimmerman is virtually non-existent or can be easily countered by the Zimmerman defensive. The evidence bar to find a defendant guilty in the state of Florida is set very high where Florida would need a miracle or some new “smoking gun” evidence to appear for a jury to find him guilty of murder. But juries are made up of disparate people who do not think the same rightly or wrongly. For the state of Florida to win this one, they’d want to pick a jury of wrongheaded people.


37 posted on 04/14/2012 10:42:16 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

[[while the evidence against Zimmerman is virtually non-existent or can be easily countered by the Zimmerman defensive.]]

I hope you’er right- I wanna have faith in the justice system, but after trials liek anthony, oj, robert blake etc etc etc, I have my doubts

[[For the state of Florida to win this one, they’d want to pick a jury of wrongheaded people.]]

or a jury scared for hteir lives if they vote to aquit george


40 posted on 04/14/2012 10:44:48 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson