It should, that's why these individuals are hand picked to protect the president of the U.S. It's one thing to expose one's self to contracting crabs or STD's via this alleged behavior as a businessman or tourist is likely to do but it's a totally different story when these individuals allow themselves to become susceptible to intelligence blackmail by foreign parties due to their actions.
Anyways, my point in the original post was not that it is ok for agents to be picking up prostitutes (both from a health perspective, an optics and pr perspective, and a national security perspective just in case the 'prostitute' is more than that). My point was that it is myopic for a poster to say the story is 'false' because he/she doesn't believe a Secret Service agent can do such a thing. I was saying as long as the posts are held by humans, in a sample size there will always be those who should have known better but did otherwise. Even with the best selection processes it is difficult to assure, always, a given outcome (although some, like Tier One services like DEVGRU, CAG and the FBI's HRT, come exceedingly close). In most cases, whether it be priests, cops, soldiers - or SS agents -, there will always be that stupid few who think they can get away with something. Saying a story is false because 'x' can't do 'y' was my target during my first post.