The only thing the affidavit is meant to show is probable cause to charge him. It is not a full listing of evidence, and it isn’t supposed to contain enough evidence to convict. Having said that, it still sounds pretty weak to me.
I agree. This is by no means all the prosecution has, but even on it’s own, it’s a weak document.
The most damning claim is that Z followed M after being “instructed” by a dispatcher not to do that. That’s been dealt with numerous times, the dispatcher has no legal authority to command Z. It doesn’t address the actual fight beyond “A struggle ensued”, a phrase that could be used to describe what happened after Germany invaded Poland.
This is pretty lame stuff.