[Moonman62]

I am not asking for proof. I have asked for quality and something that is believable. I gave you an example, and told you the reasons why it is believable. No intelligent person with reasonable judgement would expect the criteria that applied to that example to be a standardized test for all experiments.

Each experiment would have to be judged on its own merits. If you don't have good judgement by now (and your posts suggest you don't), then I can't help. Much of it comes from life experience. I can give you a hint that using a 90 year old former scientist, who endorses scams, as a source isn't a good move.

[Wonder Warthog]

"I am not asking for proof. I have asked for quality and something that is believable. I gave you an example, and told you the reasons why it is believable. No intelligent person with reasonable judgement would expect the criteria that applied to that example to be a standardized test for all experiments."

LOL. REAL science "does" have standards for judgment that "do" apply to all experiments. One of them happens to be "peer review", which you claim doesn't matter.

"Each experiment would have to be judged on its own merits. If you don't have good judgement by now (and your posts suggest you don't), then I can't help. Much of it comes from life experience.

LOL. And yet you claim that MY life experience doesn't matter, but yours is paramount. I don't think so.

I can give you a hint that using a 90 year old former scientist, who endorses scams, as a source isn't a good move."

Please provide proof that Storms has "endorsed scams". The simple fact that he mentions the topics in a review does NOT "endorse scams".