Replies

"Pick the best experiment and make your case. As an example, the 1989 NASA memo is the best link you've posted. The claim for a very small and brief temperature anomaly is believable."

I'm perfectly willing to do that once you tell me what you believe constitutes proof. I'm not going to do a blind dance trying to meet some unknown criterion. Put up or shut up.

"I'm beginning to think that you don't know what fusion is. Why do you think most in the field are calling it LENR? They're giving up on their always unsupported claim that it was fusion."

I know precisely what fusion is, and the data on the ground says that in the case of the Pd/D2 system, most of what is going on is classic fusion....two deuterons fusing to yield a He4 atom and energy. That reaction is well supported by reasearch. Storm's review includes a specific section laying out the case....but you refuse to read the evidence.

For the Ni/H2 case, the mechanism is pretty much unknown...it may be fusion, it may be fusion plus fission...inadequate data. And I don't like the term LENR. I prefer LANR, which is both precise and accurate.

"I'm not trying to make a case against cold fusion. Scammers and hypers, OTOH...

And thus you lie again. You have bashed EVERY mention of CF/LENR on this forum indiscriminately.

I gave you an example of a believable experiment (which also negates your claim that I bash everything). It sounds to me like, other than that, you don't have a single experiment you can defend.

If you don't know what quality is by now, and Lord knows I've tried to teach you, then I can't help further if you won't try.

BTW, it doesn't help that Edmund Storms has endorsed the Rossi and Blacklight scams. No wonder you lack confidence.