>> “I agree, none of us know what happened yet.” <<
.
We do know basically what happened.
A thief entered a PUD community to case it for a burglary and was observad by an organized neighborhood watch patrol, who proceeded to follow standard proceedure to get a good description of the individual. Said individual objected to being observed and identified. He evaded the neighborhood watchman, and circuitously ambushed him, and attempted to beat him senseless. When no one in the neighborhood responded to the watchman’s calls for assistance, he was forced to use his concealed weapon to subdue his assailant, and in that process the assailant was fatally wounded.
This much is upheld by witnesses, and not refuted.
.
Basically, I agree with your assessment.
I pretty much agree that we don’t know all the facts, and further am willing to stipulate that Zimmerman is being railroaded, and shot Martin who was sitting on his chest and pummeling him.
I take grave exception however, to your statement that “We know” that “A thief” was casing the community for “a burglary”.
Got evidence?
Let’s not play the other sides games, or stoop to their level.