[Oztrich Boy]

"Stalking" is a loaded word characterizing intent. Following is a commonly used word that ascribes no intent one way or the other.
If you have no evidence that Zimmerman "stalked" Martin, then the correct, neutral word would be "follow".

Your point being?

"That there man can do a lot of funny things with this language of ours. He can take a word and weasel it around and suck the meat out of it like a weasel sucks the meat out of an egg, until it don't mean anything at all. " - Dave Sewell, quoted by Theodore Roosevelt

But if you ant to use the least informative term, go ahead. Weaselling is all that separates us from the animals (except the weasel)

[101stAirborneVet]

But if you ant to use the least informative term

I want to use a word that doesn't color the events to support my preconceived notion. For the record, I believe that AT THIS TIME there is no evidence to support a charge against Zimmerman, BASED ON all the information I have seen.

All the calls for his arrest and murder I have seen on the internet make use of loaded, rather than neutral, language and depictions.

If we are to advocate depriving someone of liberty, should we not do so objectively and impartially, and based upon facts and evidence rather than loaded words?