Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Godebert

“This might help ‘clarify’ the matter for you:”
________________________________________

Well, yes and no.
Obviously, it would take the SCOTUS to affirm that, thereby
confirming that Obumbo is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.

I see no indication that the court will even hear the matter.


46 posted on 03/21/2012 9:04:37 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: AlexW
"Obviously, it would take the SCOTUS to affirm that, thereby confirming that Obumbo is NOT a Natural Born Citizen."

SCOTUS already has 'confirmed' that.

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT IS BINDING PRECEDENT AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

53 posted on 03/21/2012 9:18:05 PM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson