The point is about fathers having the right to protect the lives of their children; invariably, when such articles are put on forums, some will sidetrack the discussion by going on about “irresponsible” fathers. That sidetracking has the effect of rendering good fathers - the majority - invisible by placing the focus on “irresponsible” fathers instead.
That noted, the points in your more recent post are accurate. It is insanity for society to tell men - as it does by having abortion as a legal choice for women - that they should be ambivalent about whether their children live or die between conception and birth and then suddenly feel a sense of responsibility to those same children upon birth.
That is a society-killing disconnect.
It results in women who abort being sociopath bitches who profess that they can do whatever they want to whomever they want, regardless of who gets hurt or killed.
It results in men stripped of any reason to care about the future.
In short, it’s the death of civilization.
The intent is not to sidetrack, but point out the ridiculous inconsistency of the law which renders men bystanders to the whole process.
And you're right. It results in men stripped of any reason to care about the future.
But good men care anyway and get involved.