It’s a fashion doll. A child’s toy. No grown man would admit to being “injured” by it. A little boy might, to gain sympathy from Mommy.
At that point, he still had the upper hand. All he had to do was document it, and who looks bad? She does.
He wants her out of the house? At that point, he has reason to do so when he decides to *legally* evict her.
He decides he’s going to act like a little boy, and not like a man.
A boy thinks it is appropriate to beat up a woman because ONE child’s toy was thrown, not a man.
A boy thinks it is appropriate to snatch a woman’s cell phone from her, not a man.
A boy thinks it is appropriate to illegally order a woman from her home, not a man.
Because a man knows how to use his brain and act in wisdom, a boy does not.
A conservative man realizes that her two-year-old behavior reflects on her, not him, and not done anything stupid—under no circumstances would a conservative man decide to also engage the girlfriend in two-year-old behavior.
A liberal boy feels impotent at the act and needs to “teach her a lesson”.
Perhaps that is the problem. A weak, impotent man feels he must beat up a woman because he realizes she is the one person that truly sees how weak and how lacking as a man he really is.
She gets to throw things at him and his only option is to let her and/or run away? Whether or not it hurt him or could hurt him is completely irrelevant.
HER lack of control and violent behavior started the confrontation. After denying it you’re now admitting it.
You’re making the standard “man up” argument that women so often use which translates to “lie down like a doormat and do nothing while I walk all over you”. Which is exactly the opposite of being a man.
According to you, she’s accountable for nothing and the criticism is reserved solely for him. You sound like a stereotypical left-wing man-hating feminist. What are you doing on freerepublic?