Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas

True.
Because, if slavery was NOT expanded, the abolitionists would have control of Congress. When that state finally occurred, the representatives of these “Free” states imposed high tariffs and excises on overseas trade - which mostly impacted the South and favored Northern industries.

When faced with the reverse - a independent South with a 10% tariff, the North saw grass growing the deserted streets of New York and Boston - and no alternative but war.


44 posted on 03/06/2012 11:40:28 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
Because, if slavery was NOT expanded, the abolitionists would have control of Congress.

They had a far more compelling problem than that. If slavery were not expanded to new markets, two things would have happened because of the rapidly growing slave population. First, the price of slaves would have collapsed wiping out the biggest source of capital in the South. Second, they would eventually be hopelessly out numbered by slaves with the very real possibility of Southern States ending up like Haiti.

The entire John Brown scenario was the worst fear for the old slave masters.

59 posted on 03/06/2012 1:28:39 PM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

Which was why the South opened fire on US forces at Ft. Sumter.


80 posted on 03/06/2012 9:35:42 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson