Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rrebo

From I’ve heard and seen from the trailor it looks like the story is pretty different to me, but I hope you are right! I mean, I thought “A Princess of Mars” was just a fantastic and classic title, why did they have to change that? And why not “of MARS” in it at all?!

Freegards, may your thoat never stumble


12 posted on 03/04/2012 5:34:02 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ransomed

I’ve been known to call someone “an old ulsio” on occasion.


14 posted on 03/04/2012 5:38:11 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed
I think the (silly) reason there is no “Mars” in the title is that the last 10 movies out of Hollywood with “Mars” in the title sucked and were total box office bombs.

That being said - I think “A Princess of Mars” is a perfectly cromulent title - and they should have stuck with it.

59 posted on 03/05/2012 10:30:51 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson