Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: csvset

“This novel radio technique allows the implementation of, in principle, an infinite number of channels in a given, fixed bandwidth.”

Sounds like a good reason to hand out FCC licenses like candy, once they’ve got this perfected and commercially available.

How about, every smartphone use gets an FCC license to transmit audio and video on a unique frequency/angle, kicked up to a nationwide network of cellular re-transmitters, with all the other smartphones having the capacity to pick up each other’s broadcasts? Goodbye media stranglehold. Just follow what stations you like, just like twitter.


2 posted on 03/03/2012 2:03:23 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

This is infinite bandwidth everywhere without a ton of infrastructure. A world changer. Thinking of the possibilities will boggle your mind.

What amazes me is that this isn’t new technology. It took 20 years (the theory behind this is over 100 years old and OAM properties where proven in a lab 20 years ago) before an extremely small group decided to experiment and demonstrate orbital angular momentum practicability. With billions spent on bandwidth a bunch of telecomm CEOs should be slapping their heads in amazement at their stupidity.


3 posted on 03/03/2012 3:37:01 AM PST by BushCountry (I hope the Mayans are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
“This novel radio technique allows the implementation of, in principle, an infinite number of channels in a given, fixed bandwidth.”
Sounds like a good reason to hand out FCC licenses like candy, once they’ve got this perfected and commercially available.

How about, every smartphone use gets an FCC license to transmit audio and video on a unique frequency/angle, kicked up to a nationwide network of cellular re-transmitters, with all the other smartphones having the capacity to pick up each other’s broadcasts? Goodbye media stranglehold. Just follow what stations you like, just like twitter.

Perfectly logical. But FCC regulation was always about maximizing the value of spectrum by keeping channel licenses scarce. There was obviously some rationale for their actions, of course - but they did not want every Tom, Dick, and Harry to have a broadcast channel.

I mean, what exactly has prevented you from being able to broadcast with your cell phone? Nothing, except laws against receiving your transmission which, implemented on everyone else’s cell phone, prevent all but one receiver from getting your signal. Laws which were violated by that couple (IIRC, the Martins?) in Florida, who were "just minding their own business" and Shazam! they picked up and recorded a conversation between Newt Gingrich and another Republican Congressman discussing strategy.

Of course, if everything is important then nothing is important - if everyone is broadcasting, then it’s hard to stand out and get an audience. Nobody can be interesting all the time, and some of us are hard put to be interesting at any time.

6 posted on 03/03/2012 5:52:39 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
“This novel radio technique allows the implementation of, in principle, an infinite number of channels in a given, fixed bandwidth.”
Sounds like a good reason to hand out FCC licenses like candy, once they’ve got this perfected and commercially available.

How about, every smartphone use gets an FCC license to transmit audio and video on a unique frequency/angle, kicked up to a nationwide network of cellular re-transmitters, with all the other smartphones having the capacity to pick up each other’s broadcasts? Goodbye media stranglehold. Just follow what stations you like, just like twitter.

Perfectly logical. But FCC regulation was always about maximizing the value of spectrum by keeping channel licenses scarce. There was obviously some rationale for their actions, of course - but they did not want every Tom, Dick, and Harry to have a broadcast channel.

I mean, what exactly has prevented you from being able to broadcast with your cell phone? Nothing, except laws against receiving your transmission which, implemented on everyone else’s cell phone, prevent all but one receiver from getting your signal. Laws which were violated by that couple (IIRC, the Martins?) in Florida, who were "just minding their own business" and Shazam! they picked up and recorded a conversation between Newt Gingrich and another Republican Congressman discussing strategy.

Of course, if everything is important then nothing is important - if everyone is broadcasting, then it’s hard to stand out and get an audience. Nobody can be interesting all the time, and some of us are hard put to be interesting at any time.

7 posted on 03/03/2012 5:52:46 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson