Posted on 03/02/2012 11:22:22 PM PST by Steelfish
NOTE to Piers Morgan— I agree with Kirk Cameron. Except—where he was uncomfortable calling homosexuality a sin— I do.
The Holy Scriptures define it as “unnatural” an “abomination”
those who practice fornication are “worthy of death” unless they repent. NOwhere in the Christian system is it found where Jesus said “as long as you’re happy” for I believe Jesus would agree there is a way that seems right to a man but the end thereof id death. I love my son Piers Morgan. But I Hate the lifestyle he has chosen. It is destructive— It is everything Kirk Cameron said it was and more destructive. It matters Not that seven states have legalized same sex fraud-it is NOT marriage. And those States will be judged by a righteous judge-not some entertainer who says “as long as it makes you happy —ok” I have heard certain individuals claim they were happy when they committed murder. Is that what you would claim is “ok”?If it is Not ok to commit murder—Why is it OK to violate the laws dictated by God ,Himself elsewhere?
He is right... and the “Bible tells me so”. The truth is the truth... and liars will face GOD one day.
LLS
“Why hasn’t mankind stamped it out yet in these thousands of years? Are we still looking for the cure?”
satan is the reason... Christ is the answer.
LLS
I would pose it was the Holy Spirit of the Living God that was convincing. The actors were after all just actors. But God is AWESOME
While I agree with his sentiment I would disagree that homosexuality is not natural. It is. It is one of the natural results of man turning away from God and his laws.
Same with adultery, fornication, idolatry, sabbath breaking, coveting and a myriad of other sins.
All of these are destructive to society
.
You are right. God can turn anything into a convincing actor, even a talking donkey.
The movie was about living without God in his life, and his return to his faith which saved his marriage. The acting was very good in my opinion, I cannot think of anyone in the movie, which I have seen three times now as being “poor actor”. But, to each his own...
The moral of the movie was that God enhances our lives when we embrace his love, our lives suffer as we move away from God and involve ourselves in sinful activities. That is a truth that has always been and always will be.
That is why homosexuality is unhealthy for people and especially for a nation to make it legal for two men to “marry”, which of course they cannot even if the government says it is “legal”.
Don't you find it interesting that the Bible provides no justification in this verse for claims that homosexual behavior is uniquely sinful?
It is listed as one of several sins, given no particular prominence in the list.
Well how many times in the whole of the Bible is Sodom and Gomorrah mentioned? It is referred to at least by name 9 times in the New Testament alone.
I am quite in agreement that homosexual acts are sinful.
I just disagree that the Bible, the NT anyway, provides much support for the notion that they’re greatly more sinful than other types of sexual sin.
In my experience this is often because people feel much more comfortable denouncing sexual sins they haven’t participated in personally or aren’t tempted to engage in themselves.
“Don’t you find it interesting that the Bible provides no justification in this verse for claims that homosexual behavior is uniquely sinful?”
Forgive me, but I am not certain of your point.
For the past forty or fifty years, the leftists have been trying to force people to recognize homosexuality as normal and equal to heterosexuality. Their problem is, I doubt very few heterosexuals i.e. breeders think it’s anything other than extremely abnormal. Statistics prove that with maybe only 2 or 3% of the population homosexual. But since homosexuals gravitate to areas of cultural influence like the movies and literature, they’ve been successful making people believe their numbers are a lot higher. The fact is: homosexuality at the very least is highly abnormal. It would be interesting to have situations where normal heterosexual parents could press a button to decide whether their offspring would be hetero or homo. What button do you think they’d press?
He came to speak at my mom’s church a couple of years ago, and she was thoroughly impressed with him. He sees very clearly.
Let me try to explain.
God gives us a list of sins: A, B, C, D, E and F. Those who practice such things will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. This was essentially what was done in Paul’s letters to the Corinthians and to Timothy.
A great many modern Americans promptly pick out D and claim that God is particularly opposed to D and that practicing D is greatly more sinful than practicing the other sins on the list.
Can you explain how this fits with what the Scripture actually says as opposed to what we read into it?
I object not to the claim that homosexuality is a sin, but to the implicit pass given to the other sins by making homosexuality uniquely sinful.
I am not going to type all 9 times wherein the specific Sodom and Gomorrha are used... I will type the first time so one can get the idea.
Matthew 10:15 Verily I say unto you, (the you are the newly elected twelve of verse 2-4) It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
Now of course the whole chapter 10 needs be read to get the fullness of the instruction given... But Christ left no doubt that Sodom and Gomorrha would yet again be practiced. So He forewarned the individual and the nations to expect their judgment to be greater than was the judgment on the first Sodom and Gomorrha.
It really does not matter what people are comfortable in denouncing, it is what the judgment promised to the participants and the onlookers that cheer, legislate, and make like evil is good and good is evil. They are going to get theirs. To say such things is politically and even religiously incorrect, regardless of the warning in advance.
-——Homosexuality is obviously unnatural.——
Since most leftist believe in evolution...I always bring up the point when discussing this subject that if homosexual behavior is normal and natural, why haven ‘t they evolved over the evolutionary timeframe so they can procreate and their anus developed into a sex organ rather than a egres for human waste....
Never have gotten a cogent answer.....I wonder why?
Most (I think all but one) of the references in the NT to S&G do not specifically reference their sexual sin, but rather are used to describe the severity of punishment others will receive for sins that have little or nothing sexual in nature, such as rejecting the word of Christ.
IOW, the references are used not to reinforce the idea that homosexual sin is more sinful than other types of sexual sin, but rather as an illustration of severity of punishment.
Mainly, we are not looking to reorganize society and law around homosexuality and it’s behaviors and lifestyle. Homos are free to do their thing and they should not be promoting their dysfunctional thing to other people’s children (sexually grooming them).
Heterosexual unions and families should be respected, encouraged and strengthened as that is the foundation of all successful societies. Radical leftist social engineers have the central goal to tear down the Western countries and people they despise and then refashion the targeted Nations into hell’s Marxist Utopia. They should not be given that power and influence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.