Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

I always get Freddie and Fannie mixed up. The Dems will run the ads, to show Newt as taking both positions (Newt the flip flopper) but the ads will actually be aimed at the base.

Newt, probably does have the serial adulterer vote sewed up. They have been looking for a candidate since 2000.

Newt should probably take down that link to “Ashley Madison”. It’s not helping.


52 posted on 02/29/2012 8:29:20 PM PST by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: NavVet
"Newt, probably does have the serial adulterer vote sewed up. They have been looking for a candidate since 2000."

You and about 5% of the general electorate put that first.

That's the margin of victory/defeat in the last several elections. Maybe more.

And many of us small (l)ibertarians would love to discuss the requirements to win your vote with a dirty rotten scoundrel who will represent your interests.

If past sin disqualifies a man in the eyes of the Social Conservative, who can qualify?

Once we shift to relative merits, do not other qualities count?

64 posted on 02/29/2012 8:50:31 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson