I'm sure you would have leveled scathing remarks to a number of founding fathers of this nation who did not meet up with your sense of greatness.
Yea, right!
A man who cheated on two wives, becomes the nominee and asked by the media if he supports the party platform on “family values” and then is asked why he cheated?
Gross hypocrisy!
Game, set and match for Obama.
With Newt Gingrich, the commuists are going to need something substantial beyond the character attacks. Obummer is a far weaker candidate than most people realize. He is an incompetent who won last election by saying nothing for long periods of time. His speeches were MEANINGLESS, and focused on hope and change and blah blah blah.
Do you really think a master of the English language like Newt is going to be unable to tear this empty suit apart? McCain lost because he refused to fight. Obama just sailed on the whole “first black President” thing. McCain was a weakling and simply didn’t have anything to offer that could top Obama’s “platform”, just like Romney was when he lost to Ted Kennedy.
A man who converted to Catholicism after his failings, will have a lot to say to values voters and Hispanics.
Throw Dr. Gingrich into that briar patch, the media will learn quickly to avoid that question.
I'm sure you would have leveled scathing remarks to a number of founding fathers of this nation who did not meet up with your sense of greatness.
“...A man who cheated on two wives,..”
We’re choosing a politician to be a candidate for President, not a parish priest!
As for baggage, Barry Soetoro’s immigration file is firmly in the hands of Janet Napolitano, and the Democratic Party sent an operative to Jakarta, Indonesia, July 2007, to buy up all documents pertaining to Obama.
NOW, that’s baggage, and don’t forget BHO2 is loaded with it!
How do you know his wives didn’t cheat on him?