More:
*************************************EXCERPTS**********************************
A typical warmist exhortation.
Starts with convincing and undisputed scientific arguments, but rapidly drifts into mass production of straw men like "Lysenko" and "Madison Avenue".
I stopped reading at The big money in climate change involves firms, industries, and individuals who worry that their economic interests will be harmed by policies to slow climate change.
No honest person could have written that.
More:
******************************EXCERPTS*******************************************
Mike Jackson, James Lovelock has been trying to reframe the production of CO2 from living processes as "pollution" for some time.
His argument is that lower forms of life unknowingly and blindly "pollute", whereas we should recognise that the very act of our existence is pollution (and presumably should be curbed).
As the BBC repeats:
"When bacteria started releasing it as a waste gas, a billion or more years ago, it was the worst pollution incident in the history of the planet."
Link to audio here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00d43dw
Skip to Lovelock's contribution at 08:30.
We must ignore the specialisation and diversity that this event prompted of course; statis is the only option, change is always counterproductive and evil
Foxgoose