I stated common sense. How could you honestly say that’s a ‘straw assertion’?
Yes, there’s arguably an advantage to preserving our resources given the hypothetical peak-oil scenario, but is that theory anywhere near reality?
You strike me as Moderate on energy given your reservations about nuclear, and by bolstering your point with ‘sustainable renewables’. Why not invest more $ in superconductor technology?
It’s my understanding we have a few hundred years of identifiable fossil resources available in North America.
I don’t shun alternate forms of energy, but I’m suspicious of the govt involvement that wreaks of cronyism at the expense of the taxpayer.
[You strike me as Moderate on energy given your reservations about nuclear]
I don’t have reservations about nuclear. I just don’t want Homer Simpson running a nuclear facility in my neighborhood.
Do you want Homer Simpson running a nuclear facility in your neighborhood?
Driven your Cesium 137 Tractor lately Comrade?
[It’s my understanding we have a few hundred years of identifiable fossil resources available in North America.]
And it’s my opinion we should keep it that way until the Saudi’s and their Eurotrash Royal Puppeteers are sucking sand, or dirt.
Tea anyone?