>> How ‘bout calling our candidates by their real names?
You need to look up the meaning of the word “our”. Nanny boy is not *my* candidate, and I would be part of “our”, assuming you speak English and use the word correctly.
By the way, this *forum* is not in for Nanny boy, either. So tell me clearly, where exactly *are* you getting this “our” stuff?
>> We don’t call you Nervous *ick.
Not to my face, anyway. But if that trips your trigger, knock yourself out. My skin is WAY thicker than that. I’d rather be right than popular, especially among fools or Sanitarium supporters. But I repeat myself...
Some little folks are very courageous from behind the safety of a computer monitor. Some are just drunk. Both probably would have turned out better if their Momma would have let them wear a sweater vest when they were younger.
:-)
That is not true. Please stop spreading lies. Newt is JimRob's #1 choice, but he has also stated that Newt or Santorum are acceptable nominees.
To: TexasFreeper2009
If this keeps up, he’ll get my tea party vote from the heart of California’s conservative Central Valley!!
Newt or Santorum. Either one is fine by me!!
FUMR!! FUBO!!
We have a republic to save!!
6 posted on Monday, February 13, 2012 1:34:22 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)