To: org.whodat
"Chuck Who?/// how much wood, would a wood chuck chuck , if a wood chuck could chuck wood/? ????? More meaningful than what chuck thinks." Your posts rarely make sense, and this one is no different. Also, are you somehow under the impression that using three thousand question marks helps you make your point?
I think you should go back to the thread where you were defending the guy who cooked and ate cats.
To: CatherineofAragon
[I think you should go back to the thread where you were defending the guy who cooked and ate cats.]
ROFLMAO! OMG! you made me laugh so hard, I think I need to listen to a Santoum speech to bring me back down!
87 posted on
02/19/2012 12:07:53 PM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: CatherineofAragon
Stupid is not understanding and supporting private property rights. That was what I was defending. Private property rights is what makes this the country it is and you Peta people want to destroy that. And if you do not know where the old wood chuck would chuck wood came from then you missed a lot of education.
88 posted on
02/19/2012 12:10:41 PM PST by
org.whodat
(Sorry bill, I should never have made all those jokes about you and Lewinsky, have fun.)
To: CatherineofAragon
I think you should go back to the thread where you were defending the guy who cooked and ate cats. On a Michael Vick/animal cruelty thread, he called anyone who didn't like Vick a "skin head."
He must have gotten bit pretty savagely as a child. I feel sorry for him. He doesn't seem to have any friends
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson