[philman_36]

No - were were talking about the protocol for numbering sections of the Constitution.
No you made a claim...
@When the practice of using the word Clause was initiated, some applied it to the Constitution as written while some applied it to the Constitution as amended - which is what Indiana does.
And you made it again...@The Indiana Code refers to the amended Constitution.

Yet when I challenged @you this was the answer I received...

@It makes more sense then your idea that the State of Indiana doesn’t understand the Constitution.

And you have yet to prove your claim and you have even tried to brush it off with this inanity...

@New Hampshire renumbered.
And that in no manner addresses your initial claim.

[Harlan1196]

This is how YOU introduced the issue to this thread:

“How could the court make such an error? They made the same error many times over.”

In another thread on the same subject you wrote”

“And just to show how even the court in Ankeny can get things wrong I give you this...”

Now we know that the judge made no error. That in fact there are inconsistencies in how portions of the Constitution are labeled. There are Birther lawyers that agree with the Arkney judge. There are other states that use the same wording.