Abusing animals is a warning sign of psychopathy or sadism. No rational (and sane) person wants to put a psychopath or sadist in the office of president. Now to be fair, I’m not sure that a Romney supporter could be classified as a rational person, but it’s possible that a otherwise irrational person might be swayed by this issue.
Oh, I’m quite positive the GOP is in the process of once again screwing themselves and us in backing this guy.
My point here is that this story should never see the light of day in a society using a two party constitutional system of goverment with set terms. That it has is an indication that we probably ought to move to a type of representative republic designed for a less moral people. Parliamentarian democracies work for countries full of idiots. We could have called an election in year 1.5 of the Obama debacle and deposed the idiot, for example.
I’m a staunch Gingrich supporter (given the alternatives available) and my comment on this bit ISN’T because I think Romney deserves a break.
What conclusions can you make of the pyschological makeup of nearly everyone who runs for President?
Palin’s probably the only one that seems to be interested in running because she’s smart enough to know the USA as we know it is all done. She believes it doesn’t have to be that way, and some truthtelling could save it, and maybe other countries.
She’s not running, and I don’t fault her for not running. She put her family above her duty. Who wouldn’t?
You look at Romney, Gingrich, and Obama, and you have three men that would sell their families into slavery to hold the office. How long has Romney been running for President now?
Of course he’s psycho. The story still has no place in a process where we are deciding on who’s going to run the country.