Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard

Spengler doesn’t agree with the “enlightened secular model”. He doesn’t believe the brain is a machine.


10 posted on 01/30/2012 9:59:21 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: TheMole
I guess the point I'm making is that neither does anybody else who is competent in their field. Perhaps he is setting up a straw man for some reason, accusing a whole profession of an outdated belief. If he is railing against educrats, so be it, but that only means his rant against psychology is misdirected and misplaced--most psychologists have a pretty modest opinion of the education businesss and for good reason.
14 posted on 01/30/2012 10:23:01 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TheMole

This article wasn’t the place to argue the case, but to the extent I can speak of philosophy of mind as a non-professional, I sympathize with St. Augustine’s “Divine Illumination” theory. That is, what Kant calls synthetic a priori reason — our ability to understand certain things intuitively and synthesize a concept out of disparate elements — is made possible by participation in the mind of God. Kantian and neo-Kantian epistemology has roots in Augustine, but excises God from the picture.


22 posted on 01/31/2012 5:39:25 AM PST by Spengler (It's not the end of the world. It's just the end of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson