Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does America Have Too Many Laws in the Books? (VANITY)

Posted on 01/29/2012 9:45:19 AM PST by pinochet

One of America's Founding Fathers, John Adams, wanted to create "a government of laws, not of men". This statement is one of the most misunderstood in American history. The communist governments of Cuba, China, and North Korea, are nations with many laws in their books, but they are not what John Adams had in mind.

America's founding fathers created a constitution that was deliberately designed to starve the federal government of revenue. This is why they refused to impose a federal income tax on the American people, and the federal government had to survive on revenues raised from import duties.

In the 19th century, the US Congress passed many laws. However, because the constitution outlawed the income tax, the federal government was unable to raise enough revenue to employ government bureaucrats to enforce those laws. The federal government was forced by its limited budget to enforce only the important laws - those protecting the lives, liberty, and property of the American people. Today, the federal government has the revenues to employ numerous bureaucrats to enforce even minor and unconstitutional laws, that limit the rights of Americans to their liberty and property.

The late Barry Goldwater understood that you cannot cut the size of government, unless you are willing to get rid of the many irrelevant laws in the books, in order to justify the firing of the numerous government bureaucrats who enforce those laws. In "The Conscience of a Conservative", published in 1960, Goldwater said that:

"...I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents' "interests," I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can..."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: conservatism; goldwater; laws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: pinochet

Yes.


21 posted on 01/29/2012 10:41:18 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

22 posted on 01/29/2012 10:47:44 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
This is NOT the America our founders envisioned. If they saw the country today ... they probably would not have made the sacrifices that they did. We as a society don’t deserve the freedoms they fought so hard to give to us. We should be deeply ashamed of ourselves.

I feel the same way.

23 posted on 01/29/2012 10:52:50 AM PST by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Yes, and more so at the Federal level than in the states; even though some states too need to cull the useless and redundant, and splintered dead wood out of their criminal and civil law code registers.


24 posted on 01/29/2012 11:00:16 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Imagine if we actually still even had a Republican Party. We don’t. The current spawn are as evel, corrupt, and owned by China as the DEMs.


25 posted on 01/29/2012 11:01:18 AM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Family Guy

““The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”

There is a reason old sayings are old sayings; their truth.

Does anyone have an idea about how many laws and regulation with the force of law have been enacted by our Federal government since 1789? Broken down by year or Congress would be even more interesting.


26 posted on 01/29/2012 11:37:12 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Without early American morality (Puritan, early American Presbyterian, Huguenot, all), we’ll soon have nothing.


27 posted on 01/29/2012 12:02:36 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

I have read that when Dolly Madison fled the WH in the war of 1812, she took the entire collection of Federal Laws on the books consisting of three volumes.

How many carriages would be needed to remove the books of Federal laws today!


28 posted on 01/29/2012 12:19:58 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
Does America Have Too Many Laws in the Books?

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." Tacitus, Roman Senator and Historian (A.D. c.56 - c. 115)

Tacitus (c. 56/57-ca. 125) was a Roman orator and historian. In a life that spanned the reigns of the Flavian emperors and of Trajan and Hadrian, he played a part in the public life of Rome and became its greatest historian.

29 posted on 01/29/2012 2:40:43 PM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

How many citizens have read any law?


30 posted on 01/29/2012 2:47:23 PM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
How many citizens have read any law?

When the bills and laws passed in one day have to be brought in by boxes I doubt many. How many of our elected to the houses read any law before voting? ZERO!

31 posted on 01/29/2012 3:39:18 PM PST by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson