“OK, but it remains that it is his legal ruling that leads to it.”
That is correct. He will make a ruling at some point and then it will be up to the SoS. I think one can appeal to the Supreme Ct of GA after that.
But anyway what intrigues me about this case is the numerous historical documents talking about NBC. How do you argue against that? The only thing that the Obama attorney can argue is that the historical documents are wrong or that is not what they meant but as far as evidence supporting his position, he has none. So if this was a just hearing, the citizens should win the ruling. But if the judge rules against NBC all 3 will fail after the Judge rules that forged documents are not germane to qualifications.
However, one could argue that if the selective service record is a fraud, then Obama can’t hold office....
Really, since judges as a whole seem to have a vampire/cross aversion to his whole issue simply over issues of skin tone and the potential violence that could ensue, god knows how they will rule when the rubber hits the road. Prior rulings/historical documents don’t seem to matter.
All we can do is push as hard/far as we can and hope that the people ultimately rule correctly via the ballot box for every elected official involved.
excellent analysis
excellent analysis