Hi Butter,
I am sorry but i just don’t get all of this excitement.
You are worried that Obama is going say that his mom was never married and therefore he is a NBC?
First of all he can say that if he wants to. Then it is up to the attorneys to show the judge all the evidence that says they were married. Thats it. I mean you can’t give the court evidence of an ad Obama made that you argue is not true. Obama will have to submit the ad himself (he needs to assert that first before you can argue against it).
No one is going to accept an ad as evidence their parents weren’t married. I really think that this is going beyond reasonableness If I was Obama’s helpers I would read these posts just to get ideas.
What Orly needs to focus on now is how to prove the certified bc that the attorney will submit is a forgery. The judge will not care a hoot about the forgery on the wh website (except maybe for comparison purposes). He wants to know is the one he has in his hand right now a forgery. The other attorneys don’t care about the bc. Orly should have as many certified bc from that time period as possible and a document examiner with her. Thats all she can do.
Don’t worry the court proceedings will be conducted on a very methodical basis. We have Rubio and Jindall next and now there is really a problem because they get picked not elected.
Please work on getting legislation passed in your state that gives ordinary citizens standing to challenge qualifications and the duty of the SoS to check the qualifications. Spell out the definition of NBC in the legislation.
For all we know this Thursday may be the first and last time such evidence will ever have a chance to cross the desk of an actual Judge who regards himself as having jurisdiction and who regards the plaintiffs as having a valid complaint.
For what it's worth I suspect she has already applied quite a bit of elbow grease to impacting the election laws and mechanisms in her state.