Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
. If Obama argued that - and actually if that is true - then if what seizethecarp is saying about Britain’s laws is correct, Obama would not have been born a British subject or citizen or whatever it is because Britain does not confer citizenship on illegitimate children born on foreign soil to British fathers.

And a recent Facebook ad suggests that this may well be the route that Obama’s people are going to take.

This was all discussed in detail here (over 700 posts): ...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2835505/posts?q=1&;page=1

Including the new pic of Obama in the library claiming he was born of "a single mother"

Basically the father is that person named on the birth cwertificate ...weather or not he is the biological father.

Can only get taken off after a DNA test.

44 posted on 01/22/2012 3:54:38 PM PST by spokeshave (Mitt will release his tax returns when 0bambi releases his Birth Certificate and grades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: spokeshave; butterdezillion
“Basically the father is that person named on the birth cwertificate ...weather or not he is the biological father.

“Can only get taken off after a DNA test.”

That is only true for custody and child support paternity issues but NOT for NBC citizenship or UK subject at birth determinations, IMO.

On closer inspection the alleged Obama 2012 Facebook ad that says “born to a single mother” also says “raised in Kansas” for which there is absolutely no support, so it looks like the ad is BS.

56 posted on 01/22/2012 5:43:56 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson