I see you still suffer from reading comprehension problems. If you will note, I referred to electrolysis CF experiments.
"You believe Rossi built a successful device in his garage. Once again, it can't be that difficult."
Rossi used a gas-loading approach. Apparently, once you get away from electrolysis, it "is" that easy. All the "hot news" reports of late are using "gas-loading".
So where are the rate of reaction calculations that can predict energy output? Putting CF, LENR, or whatever you want to call it on the same footing as 50 year old muon catalyzed cold fusion isn't too much to ask. That's the point I keep trying to make which you keep sidestepping with personal attacks for some reason.