It’s always amusing when someone disagree with you to hear them say, “You don’t understand blah blah at all.”
I do understand libertarianism.
And I understand, perhaps better than you do, that it is closer to liberalism and leftism than it is to what our Founding Fathers implemented...a system that allowed the most freedoms in a framework where the morality was maintained by Judeo-Christian religion and anarchy and license were held in check by a populace that willing controlled their behavior so that others wouldn’t demand a strong government to do so.
Your strawman attempt to equate libertarianism with anarchy proves you don't. Or you do, but are unable to refute it without being intellectually dishonest.
a system that allowed the most freedoms in a framework where the morality was maintained by Judeo-Christian religion and anarchy and license were held in check by a populace that willing controlled their behavior so that others wouldn’t demand a strong government to do so.
And apparently, you would be first in line to demand a strong government to control people doing things you think are wrong. This is the difference between a libertarian and a statist like yourself: a libertarian wanting to change a person's behavior would do it with logic and rhetoric, not through government force. I am personally one of the most socially conservative people you could find. And, I would love for everyone to have my same morals and ethics and beliefs. But they must do so of their own volition; not out of fear of violation of the state.