To: shoedog
sorry, no longer think of him, sorry for the typo
2 posted on
01/07/2012 8:42:33 AM PST by
shoedog
To: shoedog
29 posted on
01/07/2012 8:57:06 AM PST by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: shoedog
Mitt Romney and Ron Paul smeared Newt Gingrich with all manner of distortions in Iowa. It was an incredible campaign of negativity. It worked and now Newt has to fight back. I wouldn’t mind if he did go negative. I hope Newt messes Williard’s hair up tonight and takes his lunch money.
49 posted on
01/07/2012 9:10:58 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: shoedog
Let's see, Paul, Romney, and Bachmann spent $millions smearing and attacking Newt in Iowa and Newt ran ads about rebuilding America and how great this nation is . . . and he is "thin skinned?" I suggest you buy a dictionary, clown.
Why is it permissible for all of the other candidates to relentlessly attack Newt with mostly dishonest distortions and not permissible for Newt to respond with fact about them?
Hypocrite much???
59 posted on
01/07/2012 9:20:56 AM PST by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: shoedog
“no longer think of him”
THINK this, Dog: : )
Speaker Gingrich led Republicans....the results:
* House Republicans Back After 40 Years In the Wilderness
* Voting On Each of the Contract With America Promises
* Four Consecutive Balanced Budgets (Remember what those looked like, folks?)
* Successful Massive Welfare Reform
* 11 Million New Jobs
* Unemployment Down To 4%
99 posted on
01/07/2012 10:28:17 AM PST by
CainConservative
(Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson