Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2nd Bn, 11th Mar

A risk is like a gamble. It’s based on unknowable variants. The great thing about Romney AND Obama is that both of them have very clear records on a number of issues, judges being only one of them.

It is NOT a risk. It is not a gamble. Romneys’ record tells us exactly the kind of judge that he would put on federal benches. No, they are not any better than Obamas’.

Please, please do not give me that lame bull-squeeze about how a G.O.P. controlled senate will force him to veer to the right on issues including judgships. We were told the same garbage about that squish from Crawford regarding spending and a G.O.P. congress.

That stove is hot, I don’t need to touch it twice in order to make sure.


35 posted on 01/05/2012 5:14:00 PM PST by Grunthor (Mitt better than Obama? Give me three examples.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor

So what do you want?


36 posted on 01/05/2012 5:32:49 PM PST by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "p" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson