I agree completely.
What the liberaltarians are also overlooking is that if a Ron Paul type did win (bucking the establishment), the establishment would combine forces to destroy that presidency. Even if Paul won, he wouldn’t be able to get anything done.
And what you mention is why I’ve stated that if we cannot elect a hardcore conservative who understands monetary science and what is happening and who has not only the knowledge but the political skill to implement what is necessary to fix our economy truly, then we might as well let Obammie the Commie win. If he loses, the economy is going to implode in the next 4 years, and the left will blame it all on Republicans, the Tea Party, conservatives, capitalism, whole milk. Anything and everything they detest and are trying to destroy.
If Obammie and his Commies win, then WHEN not IF the economy implodes in the next four years, they will have no way of blaming anyone but their own failed economic policies of the past 10 years (DNC controlling the houses from 2006 without conservatives having the majority needed to bring change combined with 8 years of the Commie in Chief).
Yes, I know, it would spell ruin. But every way I analyze the economic situation, I don’t see how we avoid financial Armageddon within 5 years.
Concur. I fall back on two tenants:
1. Things that cannot go on forever don't.
2. Its a good idea to compromise about what toppings to put on the communal pizza even if you don't like black olives and have to pick them off, HOWEVER, you should never compromise with someone who wants to put dog feces in the ice-cream mix.
We are past the point of no return concerning #1, and we shouldn't take ownership of any part of the dog feces ice-cream concernine #2.