Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who would the Dems rather run against in the election, Romney or Santorum? (Vanity)
Self | 1/4/2012 | Self

Posted on 01/04/2012 9:33:07 AM PST by Signalman

Just a question I'm throwing out for the FR gang. When I watched Fox News last night, it was humorous to see the two Democratic pundits, Joe Trippi and Kirsten Powers so obviously minimize Romney's results while falling over themselves boosting Santorum. I almost had the impression that these two partisan Democrats (especially Powers who's as transparent as they come) were a cheering squad for Santorum and can't wait to run against him. Or at least they believe he will be an easy opponent to beat.

Powers even let her guard down a moment and implied that the Dems' strategy against Santorum would be to paint him as a far-right religious zealot.

Anyway, that's my impression.

Disclosure. I'm a Rick Perry supporter.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: powers; romney; santorum; trippi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2012 9:33:14 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

They would rather run against Romney due to the fact that there isn’t a clear distinction between he and Obama.

Besides, I don’t really care what the democrats want.


2 posted on 01/04/2012 9:35:55 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Romney or Santorum would be ideal for Obama to run against. Romney for reasons already explained before, Santorum because he's a decisively weak on fiscal matters (see voting record who runs on tired old social conservative zealotry that most people don't care about right now.
3 posted on 01/04/2012 9:37:32 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Romney or Santorum would be ideal for Obama to run against. Romney for reasons already explained before, Santorum because he's decisively weak on fiscal matters (see voting record) who runs on tired old social conservative zealotry that most people don't care about right now.
4 posted on 01/04/2012 9:37:52 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Powers even let her guard down a moment and implied that the Dems' strategy against Santorum would be to paint him as a far-right religious zealot.

That could backfire, I've already seen talking point responses on that pointing out Kennedy was also Catholic.

5 posted on 01/04/2012 9:40:05 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Romney. Obama is weak and if the economy doesn't improve or if Iran blows up he might lose to whoever is the GOP candidate. So they want someone who, even if he wins, doesn't cost them much politically.

Look at it this way. Would you rather run against Obama or Zell Miller if the GOP had a weak candidate. Obama might be easier to beat, but with Miller you wouldn't mind losing nearly as much.
6 posted on 01/04/2012 9:41:17 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

The democraps are probably going to GOP primaries to vote for Romney, just like they did for McCain.

The are HOPING he wins.

And the endless drivel about how he is our strongest candidate and how he is the only GOP who can win against Obama is all “Please don’t throw us in that briar patch”

(does everyone know what I mean about the ‘briar patch’ reference?)


7 posted on 01/04/2012 9:43:14 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

BELOW IS THE RAT PARTY VIEW ON MITT.... I can’t say that I agree as I don’t think he has my support. But the RATS are concerned about him.....

Jim Messina the rat fundraiser for Obama said!

1) The extremist Tea Party agenda won a clear victory. No matter who the Republicans nominate, we’ll be running against someone who has embraced that agenda in order to win — vowing to let Wall Street write its own rules, end Medicare as we know it, roll back gay rights, leave the troops in Iraq indefinitely, restrict a woman’s right to choose, and gut Social Security to pay for more tax cuts for millionaires and corporations.

2) We’ll be facing an onslaught of unprecedented spending from outside groups funded by corporations and anonymous donors. In Iowa alone, so-called “super PACs” spent $12.9 million on almost exclusively negative ads. These groups will turn their fire even more directly on us in the weeks ahead to prove that their candidate is the most anti-Obama.

This race is officially on — and if we want to win, the only way is to out-organize them on the ground.

So the path ahead for Romney — or whichever of the Republican candidates is going to emerge from this process — is sadly and starkly very clear: to run even further to the extreme right, and make even more dangerous promises that threaten not only the progress we’ve made but the fundamental fabric of American society.

We also know that candidates who take these extreme positions can, in the right circumstances, win not only a primary but also a general election in just about any state.

Just ask the Tea Party senators from Pennsylvania and Kentucky, and the Tea Party governors in Florida and Wisconsin.

Watching the circus on TV, it’s tempting to think it’s almost funny — but this is not a joke.

We’ve got to be ready.

END OF RAT MESSAGE....


8 posted on 01/04/2012 9:43:14 AM PST by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialist States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Santorum. By a mile.

The God haters and social liberals would shrink from him
like vampires from garlic.


9 posted on 01/04/2012 9:43:24 AM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I don’t give a damn what Democrats want.


10 posted on 01/04/2012 9:43:58 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
My wife and I where watching the same show and saw that the people of Iowa thought Ron Paul was the most conservative by 48% to 38% mitt. My wife asked me why they would think Paul was conservative. In my opinion: Republicans and Democrats nowadays are really not different except a few tag lines or appointees. con·serv·a·tive    [kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv] adjective 1. disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change. By the first definition its Paul. Return to old values. Neither Mitt or (I dont know his first name) are returning or limiting either. I am from SC and cant wait to see some adds. Besides Obama might have to worry about a third party cause Dems are not happy with him.
11 posted on 01/04/2012 9:45:36 AM PST by Baseballguy (If we knew what we know now in Oct would we do anything different?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Romney/Obama -

Obama wins because in a contest between moderate socialism and real socialism, real socialism wins every time. Obama wins, but it’s close.

Gingrich/Obama

Gingrich loses because he supports global warming, has no connection to the base of the party, and makes Obama look good in being married to one woman and staying married to her, etc.

Obama wins in a landslide.

Santorum/Obama -

This is Obama’s worst matchup. Why? Santorum is Catholic and has support from evangelicals. Santorum gets the vote out in the heartland. This we saw last night. The folks who voted for Bush and voted for Reagan are willing to back Santorum.

This is why the knives are going to come out against Santorum by the Axelrod folks. Because they absolutely must have Gingrich/Romney as the nomination ‘contest’ because either way they win.


12 posted on 01/04/2012 9:45:56 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

The irony is conservatives want to nominate anybody but Romney because they do not view him as conservative while Dems want Republicans to nominate anybody but Romney because they think Romney will give Obama the toughest time. Conservatives and Dems have the same wish for polar opposite reasons.


13 posted on 01/04/2012 9:46:22 AM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

**** the dims!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

LLS


14 posted on 01/04/2012 9:46:54 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOLDIERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Uh, newsflash, Obama’s already got that vote locked up.


15 posted on 01/04/2012 9:47:33 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Romney is their man and their insurance policy. They correctly see him as the most liberal republican. They will do their damnest to beat him, but if Obama loses, they believe Romney will do the least damage to their liberal policies.


16 posted on 01/04/2012 9:48:37 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Whomever becomes the GOP nominee will be branded as unacceptable for any one of countless reasons. Do not wrestle with the pig in the pig sty. This election is not about their description of the GOP nominee. IT IS ABOUT THEIR MISERABLE, WRONG-HEADED, LARCENOUS, DESTRUCTIVE POLICIES THAT HAVE WRECKED THIS COUNTRY. DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IS A PROVEN FAILURE, AND NOT ALL OF THE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR LEGISLATION AND REGULATION HAVE HIT HOME YET.

Stay on message and repeat it over and over and over and over again. Conservatism brings back sanity.


17 posted on 01/04/2012 9:49:32 AM PST by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

•Eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood and use half of the dollars to support adoption instead.

•Cut in half the number of State Department USAID employees and US funding for United Nations programs.
•Eliminate funding for implementation of Dodd/Frank regulatory burdens.
•Eliminate funding for implementation of ObamaCare.
•Cut funding for National Labor Relations Board for decision preventing airplane factory in South Carolina.
•Eliminating funding for United Nations’ agencies which oppose America’s interests and promote abortion and cut the US contribution to the UN in half.
•Commit to cut $5 trillion of federal spending within 5 years.
•Immediately reduce federal (non-defense discretionary spending) to 2008 levels through across the board spending cuts.
•Freeze defense spending levels for 5 years and reject automatic cuts.
•Freeze spending levels for social programs for 5 years such as Medicaid, Housing, Education, Job Training, and Food Stamps, time limit restrictions, and block grant to the States like in Welfare Reform.
•Repeal and Replace ObamaCare with market based healthcare innovation and competition to improve America’s and Americans health, control costs, improve quality and access, and to keep and create jobs which provide resources for healthcare.
•Pass a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution capping government spending at 18% of GDP so that Congress and the President will need to balance the budget like Governors are required to do.
•Pass legislation to reform the Congressional Budget Process and support legislation to require Congress to pass constitutionally required spending bills on time or not get paid the next fiscal year.
•Implement Medicare Reforms and Innovation proposed by Congressman Paul Ryan and speed up their implementation to control healthcare costs and improve quality.


18 posted on 01/04/2012 9:49:37 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Shouldn’t you ask democrats?


19 posted on 01/04/2012 9:50:39 AM PST by stuartcr ("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

This goint to be great from a horse race point of view, I can’t find Santorums campaign web site, there seems to be a google road block. Gingrich is pissed, and when someone like him gets pissed he gets even. RP has done his job by helping destroy Gingrich, but gingrich blames Romney.
Ron Paul had the foresite to have his people hang around and get elected as delegates after the caucus. Bachman is out, Perry isn’t sure what to do, Huntsman Who? NH will not vote for Santorum, McCain the man with his finger on the pulse of America, endorses Romney ‘sic’.
This is getting really interesting!!!


20 posted on 01/04/2012 9:51:05 AM PST by qman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson