Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator

Yes, Santorum certainly smoked him in Iowa, but all indications in SC and national polls show Newt with more strength. Obviously numbers will change with Santorums latest press and with Perry (and Bachmann’s?) support in the air.


11 posted on 01/04/2012 5:52:56 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: wolfman23601

South Carolina won’t matter nearly as much in the general election as PA and OH. Santorum can win in both. I’m not so sure about Gingrich (which is the nice way of saying he would probably lose big in both).

I have my issues with Santorum, but I have fewer with him than with Gingrich. Santorum speaks well on the fly, but not as well as Gingrich. Gingrich needs to be a fast talker because he’s taken a lot of bad positions. I don’t mind folks who make mistakes and learn from them. In fact, I think they are the most reliable and best spoken. I’m just not convinced Gingrich is one of those folks.


22 posted on 01/04/2012 6:03:23 AM PST by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: wolfman23601

Like I said, the game has changed. Can’t use the national numbers from the week before, not with Perry and likely Bachmann dropping.

It’s a 4 man race, and it looks like Santorum’s the beneficiary.

He’s already up to 10 percent in New Hampshire which is 4x where he was just a few weeks ago. Likely up to around 17-18 percent nationally at this point.

Yes, he still has significant work to do to catch up, but this race still got much more interesting.


95 posted on 01/04/2012 8:00:53 AM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson