Posted on 12/30/2011 9:08:12 AM PST by eyeamok
I think what the previous poster meant was that the family would have to do without the assets--not the same thing as inflicting a penalty on innocent persons.
The fifth and sixth amendments have to do with people's rights when accused of a crime and brought to trial. Unfortunately Madison didn't include anything about the prosecutor or the witnesses for the prosecution having to be honest and truthful. Maybe there was already something to that effect in the common law.
Please include me on your ‘SillyconValley Ping List’
All right, all right. I’m now officially a dork.
LOL
Happy New Years!
Alan Dershowitz Reference: “TESTILYING”
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/dershowitz_test_981201.htm
See also below
http://www.soc.umn.edu/~samaha/cases/slobogin,%20testilying.htm
(Cite as: 67 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1037)
University of Colorado Law Review
Fall 1996
Reform
The Police
*1037 TESTILYING: POLICE PERJURY AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT
Nothing New here, just same old, same old. Just New Player’s.
Surely you don't expect rookie cops to know how to plant false evidence and then bear false witness to it in Court without someone showing them how. Do you?
Good ping, just wow..! omg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.