Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

Long time no see, Mr. Smith...

It seems that many people see this as a Commonwealth of Virginia law. May be, but if so, then it is a law that uniquely applies to the Republican Party and no other, and so unconstitutionally discriminates against Republican voters by establishing ballot criteria for their candidates which differ substantially from the criteria established for other parties. Perhaps they are not arguing this point, but I think it is a valid one.


86 posted on 12/27/2011 5:28:41 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine

He’s just challenging the state law’s requirement that petition-gatherers be elegible state voters- which the SC ruled against before, and it’s requirements for the numbers of signatures.

I think this is an ‘out’ for the RPV and they’ll be glad to take it and let everyone who declared be on the ballot ( and it moots any disputes about the Party’s own procedures...)


97 posted on 12/27/2011 5:38:56 PM PST by mrsmith (Start electing a 'Tea Party' House Speaker in 2012 now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson