To: TBBT
The only purpose served by the RPV ballot access rules is to be a barrier to emergent campaigns. It sounds like you are all for establishment/incumbent protection... No, I am actually against the establishment/incumbent protection. What I am for, is selecting viable candidates that put forth the effort to get out and campaign and gather signatures. What I am for is candidates that can recognize this is how WE in this state wish to be represented; not to go crying to courts because things didn't go your way. Because if you can't get it from the representatives the people elected, we'll just go to the black robed masters.........Al Gore Perry.
28 posted on
12/27/2011 4:24:46 PM PST by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
To: All
This is one of those threads where the Romney trolls just can’t help but identify themselves.
33 posted on
12/27/2011 4:32:32 PM PST by
rbmillerjr
(Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
To: Repeat Offender
crying to courts
That depends on whether the rules truly are unconstitutional. If they are, then would you still want them?
64 posted on
12/27/2011 5:05:15 PM PST by
xzins
(Pray for Our Troops Remaining in Afghanistan, now that Iran Can Focus on Injuring Only Them)
To: Repeat Offender
The way the people speak is when they vote. Having nothing but a nutcase and a loser on the ballot is a serious problem.
Have you no shame?!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson