by Judith Curry
Here are a few things that caught my eye this past week.
Changing rhetoric
Brown Universitys Climate and Development lab has in interesting post entitled Running from climate change: Obama administrations changing rhetoric.
The phrases climate change and global warming have become all but taboo on Capital Hill. These terms are stunningly absent from the political arena, and have been since 2010. As Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) SAID on October 13th, It has become no longer politically correct in certain circles in Washington to speak about climate change or carbon pollution or how carbon pollution is causing our climate to change. Why?
The ratio of the administrations usage of climate change versus energy has changed significantly since Obamas 2008 campaign days. Climate change rhetoric saw its brief heyday in 2009, thanks to the popularity of the President, the streamlined message of unified party government, and the hope for legislative action before the United Nations climate change negotiations in Copenhagen. Climate change rhetoric was most prominent during 2009, when it was mentioned 246 times and the months with highest frequency were April and November. Interestingly, the only point at which these two levels were equivalent was in November of 2009the month the Copenhagen Conference began. Since then, the ratio of energy to climate rhetoric has steadily increased, and the phrase climate change is routinely omitted in favor of clean energy-related diction.
JC comment: the changepoint at Nov 2009 is telling.