Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: icwhatudo

I doubt they movie theatres would make it, just because I doubt its ability to be a commercial success.

The story is too unfamiliar with film audieances and it seems sort of open-ended, when audiences like films that do end.


44 posted on 12/20/2011 10:42:42 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30
because I doubt its ability to be a commercial success.

Which is precisely why when Tolkien's publisher wouldn't print it and made him write the Hobbit and LotR instead. The Silmarillion was finally published by Christopher Tolkien after his father died.

Like you, I really can't imagine it making a successful movie franchise. The scale is too big, the stories too depressing and unsatisfying, the relationships too complex. It makes a better fireside tale than H'wood hit.

113 posted on 12/22/2011 7:11:44 AM PST by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson