.THIS IS A BIPARTISAN THRUST FOR FASCISM. DO NOT BLAME OBAMA. THE MAIN PROPONENT AND BILL SPONSOR OF THIS CORPORATIST FASCISM IS REP. LAMAR SMITH, REPUBLICAN OUT OF TEXAS>
.
Traditional big media firms have contributed more than $5 million to the sponsors of the Stop Online Piracy Act, with California Democratic Reps. Howard Berman and Adam Schiff as the top recipients.
The bill, known as SOPA, would strengthen and extend the penalties for online copyright violations, and could force websites hosting pirated content to come down or prevent search engines from sending users their way. Legacy media companies stand to benefit if there's less unlawful movement of their content on the web, like pirated movies and songs for download.
Some of the nation's top tech companies — Facebook, Google and Microsoft, among others — have spoken out against the bill while media companies have pushed to defend it. SOPA's companion legislation in the Senate, the PROTECT IP Act, is on hold.
Earlier this month we noted that Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, the bill's sponsor in the House, has received nearly $400,000 from the TV, music and movies industry during his career, including some recent timely donations from broadcasting and television groups that are lobbying for the bill.
Among the 25 SOPA cosponsors from both sides of the aisle, here's a breakdown of which legislators have brought in donations from big media in TV, music and movies during their careers in Congress.
The nearly 40 cosponsors of the Protect IP Act, SOPA's partner legislation in the Senate, have received more than $13.5 million from the TV, music and movies industry since entering Congress. Here's a rundown:
Many groups have lobbied for the PROTECT IP Act, including several that employ lobbyists who have worked for the members of Congress who have signed on to the legislation. Among them:
Amazon spent $450,000 on lobbying during the third quarter, some of which was pushing against this bill. Google Inc. also spent some of its $80,000 in third quarter lobbying on fighting this measure, as did Intel, which spent nearly $1 million lobbying in Q3.
SOPA was introduced at the end of October, so lobbying on that bill will show up on fourth quarter lobbying disclosure forms.
Thanks! That is great info. Back in the mid-80s, as C-SPAN was taking root, someone proposed that as Members spoke, their relationships to the bill being discussed should be on a banner on the screen. Obviously, that came to naught, but I thought it was a good idea then and still think it’s a good idea today.
I can see why so many CA Members especially are involved with this. Remember, when Sonny Bono came to Congress, no one could figure out why he (of all people) wanted to be on the Judiciary Committee. Well, duh. Copyrights meant something to him personally.
This ‘secret court’ business, tho is VERY disturbing. It has its place for real terrorism, but I don’t see its necessity for copyrights. It would help if the courts were more efficient, tho they don’t have power over pirates from India, Thailand, etc. who have their products on the street the very day of a new release.