These powerpoints (there are 3 of them released today) mention Rossi only in part, in the context of overall LENR research. So are you hostile to all LENR research, or is it Rossi specifically whom you object to?
Maybe you should contact NASA and warn them before they get suckered by Rossi's scam. Sounds like they are in danger of taking the bait... (/s)
Maybe you should contact NASA and warn them before they get suckered by Rossi's scam. Sounds like they are in danger of taking the bait... (/s)Don't worry, it looks like NASA has Rossi's number (LINK):
Bushnell failed to mention that NASA had already made attempts to perform due diligence on the Rossi device. Some of the people involved in those attempts were in attendance at this workshop.In the timeline shown in Nelsons slides, Nelson omitted the Sept. 5 and 6, 2011 Rossi device tests performed in Bologna for engineers representing Quantum Energy Technologies. NASA representatives were present both days.
One of the eye-witnesses, a former NASA staff member, saw problems from the moment they arrived there.
Rossi changed the game totally. the witness said. From the test plan, the device, everything. There was nothing there that we had agreed on. He had a 30 liter reservoir in there and he wouldnt even let us see what was in the box or weigh the box.
The Sept. 5 demonstration was inconclusive; Rossis device sprang a leak. The Sept. 6 demonstration was inconclusive; there was no outflow of steam or water.
On the second day, when the former NASA staff member asked Rossi if his device had an internal reservoir, Rossi became enraged. Quantums engineers left but NASA engineers offered to come back in a few days to give Rossi time to fix the flow. Rossi declined their offer. He said he was too busy.