Kinda scary that young kids are leftist, mush head ideologues. Bachmann response that man-woman marriage was the law of the land was woefully inadequate. That’s what the debate is all about, and the law of the land may well be changed. Marriage is between a man and a woman. period. Doesn’t matter what law of the land is. Majority votes or minority pressure does not change eternal truths.
no society can survive based on a “no child producing” marriage mandate. Homosexuals contribution nothing to society’s future via their recreational sex.
exactly...I found the “law of the land” approach lacking too.
You could tell by the girl’s face that she was listening to circular logic.
From the girls viewpoint - Michelle says...you don’t have special rights based on your sex practices.
The girl is thinking...but heterosexuals have an “extra” privelege to get married.
Everyone is missing the point.
The very definition of marriage is the union of male/female
You just can’t make it mean the opposite of what it has always meant.