[muawiyah]

No, it doesn't ~ remember, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Assume for a moment Cain is totally innocent of any sin in this. He wouldn't have records pointing toward sin, right?

She claims all the records reflect lots of sin time with her.

We all need to see those records and she should make them public or David Axelrod should retire to a monestary in Russia or someplace.

[davandbar]

In the court of law—yes, but not in the court of public opinion.

For example, when Cain’s attorney gave that weird statement about this being a private affair, from a legal standpoint he is exactly right. But, it didn’t put anyone’s mind at ease regarding whether Cain had had the affair or not—especially not in Free Republic’s court of public opinion. Many thought just the opposite.

I can believe his story, but I don’t think he’s playing smart politics at this point.