[BagCamAddict]

So let me see if I understand you correctly. You think Cain didn’t handle this well. You think Cain and his attorney are slow on the uptake (”About time.”) to react and do this. But you also think it won’t prove anything.

So then why do you say “About time.” ?? If it’s not going to prove anything, then why do it at all?

And I’m assuming that even when Cain’s lawyer proves that this was all an attempt to blackmail Cain, you will refuse to believe that, because you have already determined that Cain:

A. Is guilty.

B. Doesn’t handle things right.

C. Isn’t fit to be President because of A and B.

Do I have it all correct?

[thesaleboat]

E. I am voting for Cain, and I said about time that his lawyer did something about this whole mess.

[thesaleboat]

and what will it prove was in reference to seeing the records of 62 phone calls/text messages, unless we can actually hear what was said and read the messages.