Yes, he picked his attorney and I understand what you’re saying there. I’ve seen a number of bad decisions/choices on his part. But I keep hearing that everyone wants a candidate who is not a politician. Apparently we don’t, because the minute his inexperience shows we gang up on him. But we see some of the same stupid goofs and gaffs from so-called experienced politicians, so what the heck?
Not everyone keeps their texts. But if he didn’t delete them, and they could exonerate him, then he should release them by all means. On the other hand, if he knows they’ll prove he did what she accuses, he should just say as much and drop out.
However, since she’s the one accusing, the normal thing would be that we should expect her to produce the proof - and if she’s unwilling to do that she should be treated with skepticism from everyone, but especially conservatives.
You certainly make sense. She should have to show more “proof” of an affair. And I think if she had it, it would be all over the news.
And you are right, we say we don’t want a politician, but then it seems we critisize Cain when he doesn’t act like one!
Actually, I just want Cain to show his skills as a businessman. A successful businessman must do much of the same things a politician does. They are selling a product: Herman Cain, in this case.
Successful businessmen know how to pick great people to work for them, and how to “outsell” their competition. To be successful, they have to have the ability to promote their products better than their competitors, and instill confidence in their shareholders. Cain has not shown those skills in this situation.