Replies

Tell you what, Fantasywriter. I'll pay attention to anything you have to say if you can explain (without name calling) which of the following is a "vile smear" against Cain:

- My criticism of the 9-9-9 tax plan as increasing taxes on seniors, businesses that operate at a loss, businesses that make little if any profit, average families, etc.
- My statement that running a campaign based on increasing people's taxes so they have skin in the game is electoral suicide, regardless of whether I agree that they should
- My criticism of Cain saying that it's OK to ban mosques under the 1st Amendment since that doesn't discriminate against any particular religion
- My criticism of Cain for that "blank look" on Libya and not knowing what the "wet-dry" policy is
- My criticism that Cain accused someone of asking a "gotcha" question by asking whether he agreed to easing Cuba travel restrictions
- My criticism that he's never been in government and developed a public record where we could see how he'd govern
- My criticism that he uses the same old "I'll get good people" line when he doesn't know the answer to something
- My criticism that Cain keeps denying these allegations but never sues anyone despite hiring a nationally famous libel/slander attorney
- My discussion with others about whether Cain's campaign advisors violated campaign finance laws but setting up a non-profit and paying for Cain's travel and equipment

I could go on, but I'll let you start with that. Surely you and your superior logic skills and reasoning can explain how those are all vicious smears.

So where are all your posts advocating for the good conservative candidate of your choice? Please don’t expect me to even read, much less care about, anything you post if all you can do is criticize. If you haven’t positively advocated for any GOP candidate at all, then take your talking points elsewhere; I have no use for them.