Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dinodino
Sorry, my bad (actually the ecatnews site link is what is broken). Here is the correct spec sheet link.

It is detailed but rough around the edges. (For example, there is an amusing typo for 'pressure sensor' on page 4 at the bottom).

6 posted on 11/30/2011 7:24:13 AM PST by Liberty1970 (Skepticism and Close-mindedness are two very different things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Liberty1970

That’s fine, it’s a brochure. Where are the independent test results?


8 posted on 11/30/2011 7:34:45 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Liberty1970
Ignoring the fact that the actual specifications don;'t match the initial outline, we find the following:

2. Coolant/heating management
   f. Controls and safety/operational electronics 
       Energy Consumption    <10mWh

I think potential investors and purchasers should be concerned that the technical people involved don't seem to know that a mW is a rate of energy consumption, not "mWh".

I am sure that some will say, "well, this is just a first draft, subject to correction". That simply ignores the real question, "Why release something so preliminary when it simply reveals the ignorance and incompetence of the company"? The only rational explanation is that they are desperate to create the impression that they have a product.

Assuming that they meant "10mW", by the way, that would be the amount of power consumed by a single light emitting diode. That's some pretty inpressive design for controls, safety, and operational electronics.

20 posted on 11/30/2011 1:49:17 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson