Well, that sounds good, as far as it goes.True, but for some reason it reminded me of Steorn (see "Jury Process").
They invited an independent group of scientists to test their "free energy" system. The group's unanimous verdict was that the device didn't produce any energy.
That was two years ago, and Steorn is still around, still collecting investor's money and still not producing a product.
Well, I can't help that. And if the independent testers said it was real you'd still have skeptics for a long time insisting otherwise.
But if the independent testers turn a thumbs down on it, then at least anyone paying attention should be satisfied and would lose interest. At that point you'd only have the 'true believers' hanging on.