[DiogenesLamp]

I still have yet to see your opinion on this article:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/michelle-obamas-warning-to-gun-owners/

Why such interest in "natural born citizen" law, but no interest in Second Amendment law? No doubt some parts of the constitution are more equal than others in your opinion.

[philman_36]

I rather liked this comment...

Protecting Obama: Congressional Research Service Releases Error and Disinformation Ridden Report on Natural Born Citizen Requirement
(Maskell writes, “There is no provision in the Constitution and no controlling American case law to support a contention that the citizenship of one’s parents governs the eligibility of a native born U.S. citizen to be President.” Two sentences later he states, “…the eligibility of native born U.S. citizens has been settled law for more than a century…” If there is no controlling case law, how can the issue have been settled law for more than a century?)

[BladeBryan]

For some reason, DiogenesLamp wrote:

I still have yet to see your opinion on this article:

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/michelle-obamas-warning-to-gun-owners/

Did I ever claim you should see such my response on that? To the best of my recollection, my last FR post relating to Second Amendment rights was in this thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2752219/posts?q=1&;page=1

How is any of that relevant to the issue here?