A circuit court case from 1890 about Indians, and what makes a person an Indian in the eyes of the law.
Perhaps you should try reading WKA instead. Or are you saying that Obama is half-Apache...
You have it exactly bassackwards as is everything else you think and write. The case was about what makes a person a NON-INDIAN.
Apparently the courts decided what makes a person a NON-INDIAN is having American citizenship inherited through their father. Here is ANOTHER example of "Partus sequitur Patrem" as decided by American Federal courts.
Ex Parte Reynolds.
And just for kicks, i'll include the case just afterwards which is The United States v Rogers. It is appropriate, because that would seem to be the proper way to regard you.
He’s half Kenyan and half Indonesian.
Ms Rogers: no one gives a flying fuck about Vattel.
Journal of the Senate of the United States of America
Ordered, That the Secretary purchase Blackstone’s Commentaries, and Vattel’s Law of Nature and Nations, for the use of the Senate.
Ms Rogers: no one gives a flying fuck about Vattel.
I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising State make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations Ben Franklin, John Jay and Dickinson